In a previous interview Berry Marttin, executive member of the board of Rabobank, underlined the need to sit down together, define what we want as mankind, and take the outcome to the drawing table. He challenged the IFAMA community to come up with ideas how to do so and to turn nature costing into a real life policy instrument. Changing the way all involved in the food chain operate, from farmers, traders, processors, retailers, policy makers, and governments to consuming citizens. This time Marttin shares his view on the Green Deal, the EU's roadmap for making the EU's economy and food system sustainable.
Green Deal
The EU has the ambition to be the first climate neutral continent by 2050, EU president Ursula von der Leyen and and vice president Green Deal Commissioner Frans Timmermans declared in december 2019. This will happen, as the European Committee plans, "by turning climate and environmental challenges into opportunities across all policy areas and making the transition just and inclusive for all." It's a huge ambition. As soon as it came out, it was criticized for not being very specific on the criteria and metrics. And thus not being specific on the results the spending of €1 trillion of public money breeds on its way till 2050.
Agriculture and Food are an integral part of the Green Deal. In a dedicated chapter called the 'Farm to Fork Strategy' , the goals for the food systems were announced. The Commission will take action to:
Furthermore, the Commission will reduce by 50% the sales of antimicrobials for farmed animals and in aquaculture by 2030. It will boost the development of EU organic farming area with the aim to achieve
(25 % of total farmland) under organic farming by 2030.
The EU has the ambition to be the first climate neutral continent by 2050, EU president Ursula von der Leyen and and vice president Green Deal Commissioner Frans Timmermans declared in december 2019. This will happen, as the European Committee plans, "by turning climate and environmental challenges into opportunities across all policy areas and making the transition just and inclusive for all." It's a huge ambition. As soon as it came out, it was criticized for not being very specific on the criteria and metrics. And thus not being specific on the results the spending of €1 trillion of public money breeds on its way till 2050.
Agriculture and Food are an integral part of the Green Deal. In a dedicated chapter called the 'Farm to Fork Strategy' , the goals for the food systems were announced. The Commission will take action to:
- reduce by 50% the use and risk of chemical pesticides by 2030
- reduce by 50% the use of more hazardous pesticides by 2030
- reduce nutrient losses by at least 50%, while ensuring no deterioration on soil fertility
- reduce fertilizer use by at least 20% by 2030
Furthermore, the Commission will reduce by 50% the sales of antimicrobials for farmed animals and in aquaculture by 2030. It will boost the development of EU organic farming area with the aim to achieve
(25 % of total farmland) under organic farming by 2030.
It would be a shame if this time we do something and then ten years later realize it was not the right thing to doDrawing Board
“The Green deal is very important", say Marttin. "If we get the criteria right, we have funds available to get it going. For the Green Deal it is crucial to sit down as an industry and ask ourselves, what do we want to achieve? If we want a carbon neutral Europe, we have to go back to the drawing board. If all of the resources are scarce you have to balance all of them. You need to know what you want and set the criteria right. It would be a shame if this time we do something and then ten years later realize it was not the right thing to do.”
Smart Use
A conversation between business, farmers, academia, governments, and NGO's is absolutely necessary, Marttin explains. The Green Deal is only going to work if those parties gather, create a common understanding, and show the way. Suddenly Marttin says "we need to have a Paris Agreement on Food. To agree on what is right and to choose direction." In order to put the Green Deal money to what he calls 'smart use' according to society's common goals and ambitions, we need to define the changes that will have the biggest impact on reducing our food footprint on nature. Smart use is about making choices and acting on them
Unless we start talking facts instead of frames, Marttin says, that won't happen. An intellectual transition is needed as perceptions of sustainability are unclear and fuzzy or even outright wrong. For example, Marttin doesn't accept the idea of sustainability per unit of weight. The so-called unsustainability of milk versus analogue milk products should be accounted for in terms of nutritional value.
Berry Marttin, Rabobank
Berry Marttin has been with Rabobank since 1990. As an Executive Board member he is responsible for the bank's international food and agri strategy. He joined the bank as a management trainee, shortly after completing his degree in business administration in Brazil. During his years at Rabobank, he gained extensive experience as an international banker, both in wholesale and retail banking business.
Berry Marttin has been with Rabobank since 1990. As an Executive Board member he is responsible for the bank's international food and agri strategy. He joined the bank as a management trainee, shortly after completing his degree in business administration in Brazil. During his years at Rabobank, he gained extensive experience as an international banker, both in wholesale and retail banking business.
Related
I apologize! I used the Dutch word ('een biljoen') for one trillion in English (1.000.000.000): one billion. A trillion in English is just 1.000 million (the Dutch say 'een miljard'). A trillion is 1.000.000.000.000 ('een biljard' in Dutch). The Green Deal is spending one trillion of Euro's on greening!
#4 agreed.
It begins to sound like a business case whereof Martin wants to know that it will last for 15 years. As it was in retail in the '90. You placed a dot on the horizon and you took (and had) 5-7 years to get there. Everybody happy and all was clear.
We don't want to do it wrong. I thought, well in the next sentence we are going to hear about biofuels, but that didn't happen...
Does Berry need a short course in disruptive? To learn that financing a project is no longer ROI. The return in Return on Investment does not exist anymore. Because the return can be gone within 3 years by innovation. Welcome tot disruptive ;-).
Take Corona for that matter. Will there be traffic jams like there were in the Netherlands in rush hour. Or does a lot of workers choose to work from home for 1 or 2 days? Aren't companies looking at their buildings to reduce office cost, reducing rent for office floor space?
Isn't it so that many companies will make a (huge) step in reducing flying miles.
Will that return or did all the directors en CEO's learn how to use Zoom and Teams. Will CEO's mis flying and being away from home every week/month?
And than, how will company's explain a return of flying miles in 2021 on their CSR Corporate social responsibility ladder in comparison to 2020?
Note: Should we also have this conversation about energy?
Having heard about the Shell papers in the Netherlands on the Dutch digital paper the correspondent. How close are/where we already to invest otherwise? Not just invest for the money? How hard will it hit Shell that the didn't do it? That they relied on the 'sure and secure' investment fossil fuel was. Until Corona came and oil barrel price went negative. Who at Shell predicted that for the coming 5 years in let's say 2017 for example? How is the ROI on the investments developing of 2016 and 2017 because of 2020?
Because Amelia Oei, we're living in an economy of waste which is more profitable.
Interesting thought of mr. Marttin: criteria to spend the billions euros should be based on nutriënt accounting. Produce the most needed nutrients with the lowest impact. Why is nobody advocating this?
We should invest more in biostimulant studies ,(Orthosilicic acid) in order to reduce the pesticides and other chemical treatments. it's a good alternative to use in the sector.